linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: export folio_pte_batch as a couple of modules might need it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:01:40 +1300
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>, 
	Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, 
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: export folio_pte_batch as a couple of modules might
 need it

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 5:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:40:50PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> >
> > madvise and some others might need folio_pte_batch to check if a range
> > of PTEs are completely mapped to a large folio with contiguous physcial
> > addresses. Let's export it for others to use.
>
> It doesn't look exported to me in the patch (and that's a good thing!).
>
> But even for making it non-static you probably want to include that in
> the series actually making use of it.

at least two parallel jobs[1][2] (maybe more ) need it right now.
Getting this one pulled in early
will help build a common base for them and avoid duplicates&conflicts in them.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240118111036.72641-7-21cnbao@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240225123215.86503-1-ioworker0@gmailcom/
>
> > +extern int folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr,
> > +             pte_t *start_ptep, pte_t pte, int max_nr, fpb_t flags,
> > +             bool *any_writable);
>
> no need for the extern here.

Yes. this has been moved to internal.h as "static inline" in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240227104201.337988-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/

Thanks
Barry