[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd41Nltnoen0cPYX@x1>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:17:10 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] perf threads: Move threads to its own files
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:31:33AM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> I can see some other differences like machine__findnew_thread()
> which I think is due to the locking change. Maybe we can fix the
> problem before moving the code and let the code move simple.
I was going to suggest that, agreed.
We may start doing a refactoring, then find a bug, at that point we
first fix the problem them go back to refactoring.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists