| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240228070617.ebf2408f0d9b35e356faf01b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:06:17 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Prevent trace_marker being bigger than
unsigned short
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:57:06 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> The trace_marker write goes into the ring buffer. A test was added to
> write a string as big as the sub-buffer of the ring buffer to see if it
> would work. A sub-buffer is typically PAGE_SIZE in length.
>
> On PowerPC architecture, the ftrace selftest for trace_marker started to
> fail. This was due to PowerPC having a PAGE_SIZE of 65536 and not 4096. It
> would try to write a string that was around 63000 bytes in size. This gave
> the following warning:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> precision 63492 too large
> WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 2538829 at lib/vsprintf.c:2721 set_precision+0x68/0xa4
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 15 PID: 2538829 Comm: awk Tainted: G M O K 6.8.0-rc5-gfca7526b7d89 #1
> Hardware name: IBM,9080-HEX POWER10 (raw) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NH1060_018) hv:phyp pSeries
> NIP: c000000000f57c34 LR: c000000000f57c30 CTR: c000000000f5cdf0
> REGS: c000000a58e4f5f0 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G M O K (6.8.0-rc5-gfca7526b7d89)
> MSR: 8000000002029033 <SF,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48000824 XER: 00000005
> CFAR: c00000000016154c IRQMASK: 0
> GPR00: c000000000f57c30 c000000a58e4f890 c000000001482800 0000000000000019
> GPR04: 0000000100011559 c000000a58e4f660 c000000a58e4f658 0000000000000027
> GPR08: c000000e84e37c10 0000000000000001 0000000000000027 c000000002a47e50
> GPR12: 0000000000000000 c000000e87bf7300 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR20: c0000004a43ec590 0000000000400cc0 0000000000000003 c0000000012c3e65
> GPR24: c000000a58e4fa18 0000000000000025 0000000000000020 000000000001ff97
> GPR28: c0000001168a00dd c0000001168c0074 c000000a58e4f920 000000000000f804
> NIP [c000000000f57c34] set_precision+0x68/0xa4
> LR [c000000000f57c30] set_precision+0x64/0xa4
> Call Trace:
> [c000000a58e4f890] [c000000000f57c30] set_precision+0x64/0xa4 (unreliable)
> [c000000a58e4f900] [c000000000f5ccc4] vsnprintf+0x198/0x4c8
> [c000000a58e4f980] [c000000000f53228] seq_buf_vprintf+0x50/0xa0
> [c000000a58e4f9b0] [c00000000031cec0] trace_seq_printf+0x60/0xe0
> [c000000a58e4f9e0] [c00000000031b5f0] trace_print_print+0x78/0xa4
> [c000000a58e4fa60] [c0000000003133a4] print_trace_line+0x2ac/0x6d8
> [c000000a58e4fb20] [c0000000003145c0] s_show+0x58/0x2c0
> [c000000a58e4fba0] [c0000000005dfb2c] seq_read_iter+0x448/0x618
> [c000000a58e4fc70] [c0000000005dfe08] seq_read+0x10c/0x174
> [c000000a58e4fd10] [c00000000059a7e0] vfs_read+0xe0/0x39c
> [c000000a58e4fdc0] [c00000000059b59c] ksys_read+0x7c/0x140
> [c000000a58e4fe10] [c000000000035d74] system_call_exception+0x134/0x330
> [c000000a58e4fe50] [c00000000000d6a0] system_call_common+0x160/0x2e4
>
> The problem was that in trace_print_print() that reads the trace_marker
> write data had the following code:
>
> int max = iter->ent_size - offsetof(struct print_entry, buf);
>
> [..]
> trace_seq_printf(s, ": %.*s", max, field->buf);
>
> Where "max" was the size of the entry. Now that the write to trace_marker
> can be as big as what the sub-buffer can hold, and the sub-buffer for
> powerpc is 64K in size, the "max" value was: 63492, and that was passed to
> trace_seq_printf() which eventually calls vsnprintf() with the same format
> and parameters.
>
> The max "precision" that "%.*s" can be is max signed short (32767) where
> 63492 happens to be greater than.
>
> Prevent the max size written by trace_marker to be greater than what a
> signed short can hold.
This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you,
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/C7E7AF1A-D30F-4D18-B8E5-AF1EF58004F5@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 8ec90be7f15f ("tracing: Allow for max buffer data size trace_marker writes")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 8198bfc54b58..1606fa99367b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -7310,7 +7310,9 @@ tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
> /* Used in tracing_mark_raw_write() as well */
> #define FAULTED_STR "<faulted>"
> #define FAULTED_SIZE (sizeof(FAULTED_STR) - 1) /* '\0' is already accounted for */
> -
> +#ifndef SHORT_MAX
> +#define SHORT_MAX ((1<<15) - 1)
> +#endif
> if (tracing_disabled)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -7328,6 +7330,16 @@ tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
> if (cnt < FAULTED_SIZE)
> size += FAULTED_SIZE - cnt;
>
> + /*
> + * trace_print_print() uses vsprintf() to determine the size via
> + * the precision format "%.*s" which can not be greater than
> + * a signed short.
> + */
> + if (size > SHORT_MAX) {
> + cnt -= size - SHORT_MAX;
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> if (size > TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE) {
> cnt -= size - TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE;
> goto again;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists