linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: pi433: Remove a duplicated F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:17:33 +0200
From: Shahar Avidar <ikobh7@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com,
 benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, elder@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
 linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: pi433: Remove a duplicated F_OSC define

On 26/02/2024 16:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 07:33:38PM +0200, Shahar Avidar wrote:
>> F_OSC is already defined & only used by rf69.c source file
>> Also fix define comment
> 
> You missed periods at the end of the sentences.

Thank you for noticing.

>> -#define F_OSC	  32000000 /* in Hz */
>> +#define F_OSC	  32000000 /* Hz */
> 
> Instead of having a comment you can
> 
>    #include <linux/units.h>
>    ...
>    #define F_OSC	  (32 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
> 
> which will be more robust code (no need to count 0s).
> 

All comments are fixed in v2 which was just sent.
Please note I sent the updated patchset twice, I forgot to add v2 the 
first time...

-- 
Regards,

Shahar