| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALTww289FNGEVcF=oW+oWBXX5DKsH34opLegqa13TLRoA8SLRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:50:01 +0800
From: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: paul.e.luse@...ux.intel.com, song@...nel.org, neilb@...e.com, shli@...com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH md-6.9 06/10] md/raid1: factor out read_first_rdev() from read_balance()
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:44 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2024/02/27 9:23, Xiao Ni 写道:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:06 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 在 2024/02/26 22:16, Xiao Ni 写道:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:04 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> read_balance() is hard to understand because there are too many status
> >>>> and branches, and it's overlong.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch factor out the case to read the first rdev from
> >>>> read_balance(), there are no functional changes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Co-developed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@...ux.intel.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@...ux.intel.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/md/raid1.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> >>>> index 8089c569e84f..08c45ca55a7e 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> >>>> @@ -579,6 +579,47 @@ static sector_t align_to_barrier_unit_end(sector_t start_sector,
> >>>> return len;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static void update_read_sectors(struct r1conf *conf, int disk,
> >>>> + sector_t this_sector, int len)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct raid1_info *info = &conf->mirrors[disk];
> >>>> +
> >>>> + atomic_inc(&info->rdev->nr_pending);
> >>>> + if (info->next_seq_sect != this_sector)
> >>>> + info->seq_start = this_sector;
> >>>> + info->next_seq_sect = this_sector + len;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int choose_first_rdev(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio,
> >>>> + int *max_sectors)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + sector_t this_sector = r1_bio->sector;
> >>>> + int len = r1_bio->sectors;
> >>>> + int disk;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + for (disk = 0 ; disk < conf->raid_disks * 2 ; disk++) {
> >>>> + struct md_rdev *rdev;
> >>>> + int read_len;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (r1_bio->bios[disk] == IO_BLOCKED)
> >>>> + continue;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + rdev = conf->mirrors[disk].rdev;
> >>>> + if (!rdev || test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
> >>>> + continue;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* choose the first disk even if it has some bad blocks. */
> >>>> + read_len = raid1_check_read_range(rdev, this_sector, &len);
> >>>> + if (read_len > 0) {
> >>>> + update_read_sectors(conf, disk, this_sector, read_len);
> >>>> + *max_sectors = read_len;
> >>>> + return disk;
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> Hi Kuai
> >>>
> >>> It needs to update max_sectors even if the bad block starts before
> >>> this_sector. Because it can't read more than bad_blocks from other
> >>> member disks. If it reads more data than bad blocks, it will cause
> >>> data corruption. One rule here is read from the primary disk (the
> >>> first readable disk) if it has no bad block and read the
> >>> badblock-data-length data from other disks.
> >>
> >> Noted that raid1_check_read_range() will return readable length from
> >> this rdev, hence if bad block starts before this_sector, 0 is returned,
> >> and 'len' is updated to the length of badblocks(if not exceed read
> >> range), and following iteration will find the first disk to read updated
> >> 'len' data and update max_sectors.
> >
> > Hi Kuai
> >
> > The problem is that choose_first_rdev doesn't return 'len' from
> > max_sectors when bad blocks start before this_sector. In the following
> > iteration, it can't read more than 'len' from other disks to avoid
> > data corruption. I haven't read all the patches. To this patch, it
> > resets best_good_sectors to sectors when it encounters a good member
> > disk without bad blocks.
>
> In this case, 'len' is not supposed to be returned, caller will split
> orignal IO based on 'max_sectors', for example:
>
> IO: 2, 4 | ----
> rdev1: BB: 0, 4 |xxxx
> rdev2: no BB
>
> Then choose_first_rdev() will set max_sectors to 2, and return rdev2,
> then caller will split and issue new IO:
>
> orignal IO: 4, 2 | --
> splited IO: 2, 2 | --
>
> Finally, issue splited IO to rdev2. Later orignal IO will be handled by
> read_balance() again, and rdev1 will be returned.
>
> Is this case what you concerned?
Ah I was still in the original logic and forgot choose_first_rdev is
iterates all disks.
The case I want to talk is:
bad block range: 1------8
first readable disk: 4-----------16
The io starts at 4, but the bad block starts at 1 and length is 8.
raid1_check_read_range returns 0 and len is updated to 5. In the loop,
it can split the io as expected. Thanks for the explanation.
Best Regards
Xiao
>
> Thanks,
> Kuai
>
> >
> > Regards
> > Xiao
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kuai
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards
> >>> Xiao
> >>>
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return -1;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * This routine returns the disk from which the requested read should
> >>>> * be done. There is a per-array 'next expected sequential IO' sector
> >>>> @@ -603,7 +644,6 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
> >>>> sector_t best_dist;
> >>>> unsigned int min_pending;
> >>>> struct md_rdev *rdev;
> >>>> - int choose_first;
> >>>>
> >>>> retry:
> >>>> sectors = r1_bio->sectors;
> >>>> @@ -613,10 +653,11 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
> >>>> best_pending_disk = -1;
> >>>> min_pending = UINT_MAX;
> >>>> best_good_sectors = 0;
> >>>> - choose_first = raid1_should_read_first(conf->mddev, this_sector,
> >>>> - sectors);
> >>>> clear_bit(R1BIO_FailFast, &r1_bio->state);
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (raid1_should_read_first(conf->mddev, this_sector, sectors))
> >>>> + return choose_first_rdev(conf, r1_bio, max_sectors);
> >>>> +
> >>>> for (disk = 0 ; disk < conf->raid_disks * 2 ; disk++) {
> >>>> sector_t dist;
> >>>> sector_t first_bad;
> >>>> @@ -662,8 +703,6 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
> >>>> * bad_sectors from another device.
> >>>> */
> >>>> bad_sectors -= (this_sector - first_bad);
> >>>> - if (choose_first && sectors > bad_sectors)
> >>>> - sectors = bad_sectors;
> >>>> if (best_good_sectors > sectors)
> >>>> best_good_sectors = sectors;
> >>>>
> >>>> @@ -673,8 +712,6 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
> >>>> best_good_sectors = good_sectors;
> >>>> best_disk = disk;
> >>>> }
> >>>> - if (choose_first)
> >>>> - break;
> >>>> }
> >>>> continue;
> >>>> } else {
> >>>> @@ -689,10 +726,6 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
> >>>>
> >>>> pending = atomic_read(&rdev->nr_pending);
> >>>> dist = abs(this_sector - conf->mirrors[disk].head_position);
> >>>> - if (choose_first) {
> >>>> - best_disk = disk;
> >>>> - break;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> /* Don't change to another disk for sequential reads */
> >>>> if (conf->mirrors[disk].next_seq_sect == this_sector
> >>>> || dist == 0) {
> >>>> @@ -760,13 +793,9 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
> >>>> rdev = conf->mirrors[best_disk].rdev;
> >>>> if (!rdev)
> >>>> goto retry;
> >>>> - atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
> >>>> - sectors = best_good_sectors;
> >>>> -
> >>>> - if (conf->mirrors[best_disk].next_seq_sect != this_sector)
> >>>> - conf->mirrors[best_disk].seq_start = this_sector;
> >>>>
> >>>> - conf->mirrors[best_disk].next_seq_sect = this_sector + sectors;
> >>>> + sectors = best_good_sectors;
> >>>> + update_read_sectors(conf, disk, this_sector, sectors);
> >>>> }
> >>>> *max_sectors = sectors;
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.39.2
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > .
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists