[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240227075209.GA11972@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:52:09 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: chengming.zhou@...ux.dev
Cc: minchan@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, nphamcs@...il.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: don't need to save tag bit in handle
On (24/02/27 03:00), chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
>
> We only need to save the position (pfn + obj_idx) in the handle, don't
> need to save tag bit in handle. So one more bit can be used as obj_idx.
[..]
> mm/zsmalloc: don't need to save tag bit in handle
Does this mean "don't need to reserve LSB for tag"?
We still save allocated tag in the handle, that's what
handle |= OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG;
does.
> Actually, the tag bit is only useful in zspage's memory space, to tell
> if an object is allocated or not.
I'm not completely sure if I follow this sentence.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists