[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <uw6wet56alvrcj6erv3fwn3hqjsyijhk4ke7f54yowt3mzkreh@hiov5ttykytu>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:44:46 +0100
From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...morbit.com, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, ziy@...dia.com, hare@...e.de,
djwong@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] xfs: make the calculation generic in
xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count()
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 01:21:56PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> > + if (check_mul_overflow(nblocks, (1 << sbp->sb_blocklog), &bytes))
>
> Why would you not use check_shl_overflow()?
This looks better than check_mul_overflow. I will use this in the next
version.
>
> > + return -EFBIG;
> > +
> > + mapping_count = bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > /* Limited by ULONG_MAX of page cache index */
> > - if (nblocks >> (PAGE_SHIFT - sbp->sb_blocklog) > ULONG_MAX)
> > + if (mapping_count > ULONG_MAX)
> > return -EFBIG;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists