[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92440f47-21b7-4f4f-ad99-a99358cfbedf@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:47:57 +0200
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Use fixed addressing for VERW operand
On 27.02.24 г. 1:52 ч., Pawan Gupta wrote:
> Macro used for MDS mitigation executes VERW with relative addressing for
> the operand. This is unnecessary and creates a problem for backports on
> older kernels that don't support relocations in alternatives. Relocation
> support was added by commit 270a69c4485d ("x86/alternative: Support
> relocations in alternatives"). Also asm for fixed addressing is much
> more cleaner than relative RIP addressing.
>
> Simplify the asm by using fixed addressing for VERW operand.
>
> Fixes: baf8361e5455 ("x86/bugs: Add asm helpers for executing VERW")
> Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20558f89-299b-472e-9a96-171403a83bd6@suse.com/
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> index 2aa52cab1e46..ab19c7f1167b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@
> * Note: Only the memory operand variant of VERW clears the CPU buffers.
> */
> .macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
> - ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> + ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw mds_verw_sel), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
Actually thinking about it more and discussing with Jiri (cc'ed), will
this work with KASLR enabled?
> .endm
>
> #else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> ---
> base-commit: d206a76d7d2726f3b096037f2079ce0bd3ba329b
> change-id: 20240226-verw-arg-fix-796a63088c4d
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists