linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:18:16 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Szilard Fabian <szfabian@...emarch.art>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, 
    jwoithe@...t42.net, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, W_Armin@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge
 control support

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:31:43 +0000, Szilard Fabian wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds battery charge control support on Fujitsu notebooks
> > via the S006 method of the FUJ02E3 ACPI device. With this method it's
> > possible to set charge_control_end_threshold between 50 and 100%.
> > 
> > Tested on Lifebook E5411 and Lifebook U728. Sadly I can't test this
> > patch on a dual battery one, but I didn't find any clue about
> > independent battery charge control on dual battery Fujitsu notebooks
> > either. And by that I mean checking the DSDT table of various Lifebook
> > notebooks and reverse engineering FUJ02E3.dll.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> 
> Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
> review-ilpo branch. Note it will show up in the public
> platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo branch only once I've pushed my
> local branch there, which might take a while.
> 
> The list of commits applied:
> [1/1] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support
>       commit: 9b716ef48c90446b8d6d86726c6c3f0141e53091

Hi,

Can you please take a look at the two build failures LKP has brought up. 
They looked like some depends on and/or select clauses missing from 
Kconfig.

I'll be merging the patches that fix those into the original commit so 
don't spend too much fine-tuning the commit message.

-- 
 i.