lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240227122141.GN2587@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:51:41 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
	Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@....com>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/10] PCI: dwc: ep: Call dw_pcie_ep_init_registers()
 API directly from all glue drivers

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:04:33PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 12:24:12PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Currently, dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API is directly called by the glue
> > drivers requiring active refclk from host. But for the other drivers, it is
> > getting called implicitly by dw_pcie_ep_init(). This is due to the fact
> > that this API initializes DWC EP specific registers and that requires an
> > active refclk (either from host or generated locally by endpoint itsef).
> > 
> > But, this causes a discrepancy among the glue drivers. So to avoid this
> > confusion, let's call this API directly from all glue drivers irrespective
> > of refclk dependency. Only difference here is that the drivers requiring
> > refclk from host will call this API only after the refclk is received and
> > other drivers without refclk dependency will call this API right after
> > dw_pcie_ep_init().
> > 
> > This change will also allow us to remove the "core_init_notifier" flag in
> > the later commits.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c           |  7 +++++++
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c             |  8 ++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c         |  9 +++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c    |  7 +++++++
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c   | 22 ----------------------
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c |  9 +++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c       | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier-ep.c     | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >  8 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

[...]

> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > index ed1f2afd830a..278bdc9b2269 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > @@ -729,7 +729,6 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> >  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> >  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > -	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
> >  
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->func_list);
> >  
> > @@ -775,29 +774,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  		goto err_exit_epc_mem;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (ep->ops->get_features) {
> > -		epc_features = ep->ops->get_features(ep);
> > -		if (epc_features->core_init_notifier)
> > -			return 0;
> > -	}
> 
> why remove this check?
> 

There is no point in keeping this check since we are removing the call to
dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() below. But I should've described this change in the
commit message.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ