[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76fcc5ec-0180-4f75-aaac-5ae74f2f687a@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:50:15 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: ppc4xx: Fix fallout from rename in struct
spi_bitbang
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:23:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Assuming we don't want to have this problem in v6.8, I suggest to revert
> de4af897ddf2 and reapply it on top of your next branch.
BTW the issue here is that you sent this without comment in the middle
of a series of fixes the other two of which *do* apply to mainline,
ideally it would have just been sent separately since it needs to go
separately but if you *are* going to send a single series like this
things that are -next only should go after any fixes that are for
mainline. My automation does look at where fixes are targeted this
catches it out.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists