linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB:UAS:return ENODEV when submit urbs fail with device not attached.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:35:50 +0800
From: "WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com" <WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>
CC: <WeitaoWang@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB:UAS:return ENODEV when submit urbs fail with device
 not attached.

On 2024/2/27 17:05, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 

> On 22.02.24 21:06, WeitaoWang-oc@...oxin.com wrote:
> 
>> Maybe, my description was not accurate enough, here not add new return
>> value to scsi layer,it just add a case to tell device is gone in the uas
>> driver internal and the ENODEV error code not return to scsi layer.
>> Here just notify SCSI layer of device loss through flag DID_NO_CONNECT.
>> This is also hope to fix this issue in the uas driver internal.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> sorry for the delay. OK, I see what you are aiming at. Could you redo
> the patch with a better description, like:
> 
> We need to translate -ENODEV to DID_NOT_CONNECT for the SCSI layer.
> 
Okay, Thanks for your suggestion. And I'll improve this patch
description in the next version.

Thanks & Best regards,
Weitao