[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd9vx2pM3Ds9-dzk@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:39:19 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dev_printk: Add and use dev_no_printk()
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When printk-indexing is enabled, each dev_printk() invocation emits a
> pi_entry structure. This is even true when the dev_printk() is
> protected by an always-false check, as is typically the case for debug
> messages: while the actual code to print the message is optimized out by
> the compiler, the pi_entry structure is still emitted.
>
> Avoid emitting pi_entry structures for unavailable dev_printk() kernel
> messages by:
> 1. Introducing a dev_no_printk() helper, mimicked after the existing
> no_printk() helper, which calls _dev_printk() instead of
> dev_printk(),
> 2. Replacing all "if (0) dev_printk(...)" constructs by calls to the
> new helper.
>
> This reduces the size of an arm64 defconfig kernel with
> CONFIG_PRINTK_INDEX=y by 957 KiB.
..
> +/*
> + * Dummy dev_printk for disabled debugging statements to use whilst maintaining
dev_printk()
> + * gcc's format checking.
> + */
> +#define dev_no_printk(level, dev, fmt, ...) \
> + ({ \
> + if (0) \
> + _dev_printk(level, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + })
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists