lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a49c117-90d7-472d-987a-f26f099b6198@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:54:57 -0800
From: Unnathi Chalicheemala <quic_uchalich@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add llcc Broadcast_AND
 register

On 2/27/2024 11:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/02/2024 02:04, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
>> On 2/27/2024 7:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2024 00:07, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
>>>> The LLCC block in SM8450, SM8550 and SM8650 have a new register
>>>> space for Broadcast_AND region. This is used to check that all
>>>> channels have bit set to "1", mainly in SCID activation/deactivation.
>>>>
>>>> Previously we were mapping only the Broadcast_OR region assuming
>>>> there was only one broadcast register region. Now we also map
>>>> Broadcast_AND region.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Unnathi Chalicheemala <quic_uchalich@...cinc.com>
>>>
>>> Why did you ignore the tags? Qualcomm upstreaming guide covers this
>>> case, so please read it before sending patches.
>>>
>>
>> I was asked to remove the Reviewed-by tag as the previous version of the
>> patch gave errors on running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check',
>> that's why I dropped it.
>> It was sometime ago, https://lore.kernel.org/all/d78b4bce-7bcd-4ab0-a76b-135cee3ec9b0@linaro.org/
> 
> And where is it explained/mentioned? Every tag drop should be documented.
> 

I understand, thanks for pointing out. I will record such tag drops in the change log.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ