linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/dmabuf-heap: conform test to TAP format output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABdmKX39M6e7o_Ossyy_Yg-CYQd-7piT6DmJk8ffEU9pPpP-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:51:19 -0800
From: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/dmabuf-heap: conform test to TAP format output

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:

..

> +static int numer_of_heaps(void)
> +{
> +       DIR *d = opendir(DEVPATH);
> +       struct dirent *dir;
> +       int heaps = 0;
> +
> +       while ((dir = readdir(d))) {
> +               if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, ".", 2))
> +                       continue;
> +               if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, "..", 3))
> +                       continue;
> +               heaps++;
> +       }
> +
> +       return heaps;
>  }
>
>  int main(void)
>  {
> -       DIR *d;
>         struct dirent *dir;
> -       int ret = -1;
> +       DIR *d;
> +
> +       ksft_print_header();
>
>         d = opendir(DEVPATH);
>         if (!d) {
> -               printf("No %s directory?\n", DEVPATH);
> -               return -1;
> +               ksft_print_msg("No %s directory?\n", DEVPATH);
> +               return KSFT_SKIP;
>         }
>
> -       while ((dir = readdir(d)) != NULL) {
> +       ksft_set_plan(9 * numer_of_heaps());

Shouldn't this be 5 (one for each test_alloc_* below) instead of 9?

> +
> +       while ((dir = readdir(d))) {
>                 if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, ".", 2))
>                         continue;
>                 if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, "..", 3))
>                         continue;
>
> -               printf("Testing heap: %s\n", dir->d_name);
> -               printf("=======================================\n");
> -               ret = test_alloc_and_import(dir->d_name);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       break;
> -
> -               ret = test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, 4 * 1024);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       break;
> -
> -               ret = test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, ONE_MEG);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       break;
> -
> -               ret = test_alloc_compat(dir->d_name);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       break;
> -
> -               ret = test_alloc_errors(dir->d_name);
> -               if (ret)
> -                       break;
> +               ksft_print_msg("Testing heap: %s\n", dir->d_name);
> +               ksft_print_msg("=======================================\n");
> +               test_alloc_and_import(dir->d_name);
> +               test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, 4 * 1024);
> +               test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, ONE_MEG);
> +               test_alloc_compat(dir->d_name);
> +               test_alloc_errors(dir->d_name);
>         }
>         closedir(d);
>
> -       return ret;
> +       ksft_finished();
>  }
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>