[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170914663633.3370652.15619827146542815142.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:57:26 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Guo Hui <guohui@...ontech.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: remove unnecessary ifdefs around is_compat_task()
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:46:50 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Currently some parts of the codebase will test for CONFIG_COMPAT before
> testing is_compat_task().
>
> is_compat_task() is a inlined function only present on CONFIG_COMPAT.
> On the other hand, for !CONFIG_COMPAT, we have in linux/compat.h:
>
> #define is_compat_task() (0)
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: remove unnecessary ifdefs around is_compat_task()
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1984c805461f
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists