[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc828606-3a35-4031-bb62-0d81c426caa4@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:02:40 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "bin.yao" <bin.yao@...enic.com>, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org, quic_bjorande@...cinc.com,
rick <rick.tyliu@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: dma: Ingenic: DT bindings for Ingenic
PDMA
On 28/02/2024 02:24, bin.yao wrote:
> From: byao <bin.yao@...enic.com>
>
> Convert the textual documentation for the Ingenic SoCs PDMA
> Controller devicetree binding to YAML.
>
> Add a dt-bindings header, and convert the device trees to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: byao <bin.yao@...enic.com>
> Signed-off-by: rick <rick.tyliu@...enic.com>
Use full names.
Except that, nothing here was tested, so limited review follows.
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "DT bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h | 51 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b3f3a8f0b813
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Ingenic SoCs DMA Controller DT bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - byao <bin.yao@...enic.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#"
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
Drop
> + - enum:
> + - ingenic,m200-pdma
> + - ingenic,x1000-pdma
> + - ingenic,t40-pdma
> + - ingenic,t41-pdma
> + - ingenic,t33-pdma
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts-parent:
> + maxItems: 1
Drop interrupts-parent
> +
> + interrupts-names:
> + items:
> + - const: pdam
> + - const: pdmam
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
Nope, you have two items. Test your DTS.
> +
> + dma-channels:
> + const: 32
> +
> + "#dma-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: gate_pdma
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupt-parent
> + - interrupt-names
> + - interrupts
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,t33-cgu.h>
> + pdma:dma@...20000 {
> + compatible = "ingenic,t33-pdma";
> + reg = <0x13420000 0x10000>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> + interrupt-names = "pdma", "pdmam";
> + interrupts = <10 61>;
> + #dma-channels = <0x20>;
> + #dma-cells = <0x1>;
> + clocks = <&cgu T33_CLK_DMA>;
> + clock-names = "gate_pdma";
> + };
> +
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h b/include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..99c871bc0ea8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h
Same filename as binding.
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause */
> +
> +#ifndef __INGENIC_PDMA_H__
> +#define __INGENIC_PDMA_H__
> +
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AIC_LOOP_RX 0x5
Indexes start from 0. If these are not indexes, then these are neither
suitable for bindings. Hex for sure is questionable.
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AIC_TX 0x6
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AIC_F_RX 0x7
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AUTO_TX 0x8
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SADC_RX 0x9
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART5_TX 0xa
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART5_RX 0xb
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART4_TX 0xc
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART4_RX 0xd
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART3_TX 0xe
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART3_RX 0xf
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART2_TX 0x10
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART2_RX 0x11
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART1_TX 0x12
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART1_RX 0x13
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART0_TX 0x14
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART0_RX 0x15
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI0_TX 0x16
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI0_RX 0x17
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI1_TX 0x18
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI1_RX 0x19
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SLV_TX 0x1a
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SLV_RX 0x1b
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C0_TX 0x24
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C0_RX 0x25
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C1_TX 0x26
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C1_RX 0x27
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C2_TX 0x28
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C2_RX 0x29
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_DES_TX 0x2e
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_DES_RX 0x2f
> +
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_REQ_MSK 0xff
Nope, not a binding.
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_CH_SFT 8
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_CH_MSK (0xff << INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_CH_SFT)
Drop entire file.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists