lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240228082649.1633083-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:26:49 +0800
From: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: abelvesa@...nel.org,
	mturquette@...libre.com,
	sboyd@...nel.org,
	shawnguo@...nel.org,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	kernel@...gutronix.de,
	festevam@...il.com
Cc: imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: imx: lpcg-scu: SW workaround for errata (e10858)

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>

Back-to-back LPCG writes can be ignored by the LPCG register due to
a HW bug. The writes need to be separated by at least 4 cycles of
the gated clock.

The workaround is implemented as follows:
1. For clocks running greater than or equal to 24MHz, a read
followed by the write will provide sufficient delay.
2. For clocks running below 24MHz, add a delay of 4 clock cylces
after the write to the LPCG register.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---

 This is to upstream a downstream patch that goes through many releases
 in several years. It maybe hard to trigger, but to address potential
 issues, let's add this workaround.

 drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c
index dd5abd09f3e2..b30d0f8b5bca 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -41,6 +42,31 @@ struct clk_lpcg_scu {
 
 #define to_clk_lpcg_scu(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_lpcg_scu, hw)
 
+/* e10858 -LPCG clock gating register synchronization errata */
+static void do_lpcg_workaround(u32 rate, void __iomem *reg, u32 val)
+{
+	writel(val, reg);
+
+	if (rate >= 24000000 || rate == 0) {
+		u32 reg1;
+
+		/*
+		 * The time taken to access the LPCG registers from the AP core
+		 * through the interconnect is longer than the minimum delay
+		 * of 4 clock cycles required by the errata.
+		 * Adding a readl will provide sufficient delay to prevent
+		 * back-to-back writes.
+		 */
+		reg1 = readl(reg);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * For clocks running below 24MHz, wait a minimum of
+		 * 4 clock cycles.
+		 */
+		ndelay(4 * (DIV_ROUND_UP(1000000000, rate)));
+	}
+}
+
 static int clk_lpcg_scu_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 {
 	struct clk_lpcg_scu *clk = to_clk_lpcg_scu(hw);
@@ -57,7 +83,8 @@ static int clk_lpcg_scu_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 		val |= CLK_GATE_SCU_LPCG_HW_SEL;
 
 	reg |= val << clk->bit_idx;
-	writel(reg, clk->reg);
+
+	do_lpcg_workaround(clk_hw_get_rate(hw), clk->reg, reg);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&imx_lpcg_scu_lock, flags);
 
@@ -74,7 +101,7 @@ static void clk_lpcg_scu_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 
 	reg = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
 	reg &= ~(CLK_GATE_SCU_LPCG_MASK << clk->bit_idx);
-	writel(reg, clk->reg);
+	do_lpcg_workaround(clk_hw_get_rate(hw), clk->reg, reg);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&imx_lpcg_scu_lock, flags);
 }
@@ -151,7 +178,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx_clk_lpcg_scu_resume(struct device *dev)
 	 */
 
 	writel(clk->state, clk->reg);
-	writel(clk->state, clk->reg);
+	do_lpcg_workaround(0, clk->reg, clk->state);
 	dev_dbg(dev, "restore lpcg state 0x%x\n", clk->state);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.37.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ