[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd8PtLsUc0G8KR97@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:49:24 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] i2c: nomadik: fetch timeout-usecs property from
devicetree
Hi Théo,
> That sounds good. I have not used this prop in the DTS as it does not
> make much sense for an eval board. The target is production boards.
...
> My upcoming question is how to move forward on this series. I can do the
> patch to i2c_parse_fw_timings() in the next revision. That way it gets
> added alongside the first user of this feature. Would it work for you?
Hmmm, to be honest I have a bit of an issue with the 'no user' problem.
There is a driver which uses this feature, okay. But there is no
upstream hardware which uses this driver with this new feature. This
makes maintaining harder ("Who uses this feature?" - "Someone" - "How do
they use it? Can we modify it?" - "Dunno").
Kind regards,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists