[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd6KLf1pOkMmfR5g@bmarzins-01.fast.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:19:41 -0500
From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, mpatocka@...hat.com, heinzm@...hat.com,
xni@...hat.com, blazej.kucman@...ux.intel.com, agk@...hat.com,
snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, jbrassow@....redhat.com,
neilb@...e.de, shli@...com, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] dm-raid/md/raid: fix v6.7 regressions
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:00:56PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2024/02/16 13:46, Benjamin Marzinski 写道:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 02:24:34PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:30 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALTww29QO5kzmN6Vd+jT=-8W5F52tJjHKSgrfUc1Z1ZAeRKHHA@mail.gmail.com/
> > > >
> > > > Yu Kuai (14):
> > > > md: don't ignore suspended array in md_check_recovery()
> > > > md: don't ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery()
> > > > md: make sure md_do_sync() will set MD_RECOVERY_DONE
> > > > md: don't register sync_thread for reshape directly
> > > > md: don't suspend the array for interrupted reshape
> > > > md: fix missing release of 'active_io' for flush
> > >
> > > Applied 1/14-5/14 to md-6.8 branch (6/14 was applied earlier).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Song
> >
> > I'm still seeing new failures that I can't reproduce in the 6.6 kernel,
> > specifically:
> >
> > lvconvert-raid-reshape-stripes-load-reload.sh
> > lvconvert-repair-raid.sh
> >
> > with lvconvert-raid-reshape-stripes-load-reload.sh Patch 12/14
> > ("md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with
> > reshape") is changing a hang to a corruption. The issues is that we
> > can't simply fail IO that crosses the reshape position. I assume that
> > the correct thing to do is have dm-raid reissue it after the suspend,
> > when the reshape can make progress again. Perhaps something like this,
> > only less naive (although this patch does make the test pass for me).
> > Heinz, any thoughts on this? Otherwise, I'll look into this a little
> > more and post a RFC patch.
> >
> > =========================================================
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > index ed8c28952b14..ff481d494b04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > @@ -3345,6 +3345,14 @@ static int raid_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> > return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> > }
> > +static int raid_end_io(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio,
> > + blk_status_t *error)
> > +{
> > + if (*error != BLK_STS_IOERR || !dm_noflush_suspending(ti))
> > + return DM_ENDIO_DONE;
> > + return DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE;
> > +}
>
> I love this idea, however, there could be other reasonable case to
> return BLK_STS_IOERR, and we probably shouldn't requeue in this case.
>
> Are we agree with the idea to let dm-raid reissue the IO after the
> suspend? If so, we can let raid_map return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE directly in
> this special case.
>
> Benjamin, can you test the following patch on the top of this set? I
> verified in my VM for 20+ times that the test pass for me.
This looks sensible to me, and I have not hit an error in over a hundred
runs.
-Ben
> Thanks,
> Kuai
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> index ed8c28952b14..bd37ec94663e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> @@ -3340,7 +3340,8 @@ static int raid_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio
> *bio)
> if (unlikely(bio_end_sector(bio) > mddev->array_sectors))
> return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
>
> - md_handle_request(mddev, bio);
> + if (unlikely(!md_handle_request(mddev, bio)))
> + return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
>
> return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index a8db84c200fe..59411d20cbfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static bool is_suspended(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio
> *bio)
> return true;
> }
>
> -void md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
> +bool md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
> {
> check_suspended:
> if (is_suspended(mddev, bio)) {
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ void md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio
> *bio)
> /* Bail out if REQ_NOWAIT is set for the bio */
> if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> - return;
> + return true;
> }
> for (;;) {
> prepare_to_wait(&mddev->sb_wait, &__wait,
> @@ -390,10 +390,14 @@ void md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio
> *bio)
>
> if (!mddev->pers->make_request(mddev, bio)) {
> percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
> + if (!mddev->gendisk && mddev->pers->prepare_suspend &&
> + mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector)
> + return false;
> goto check_suspended;
> }
>
> percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
> + return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_handle_request);
>
> @@ -8765,6 +8769,23 @@ void md_account_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio
> **bio)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_account_bio);
>
> +void md_free_cloned_bio(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bio->bi_private;
> + struct bio *orig_bio = md_io_clone->orig_bio;
> + struct mddev *mddev = md_io_clone->mddev;
> +
> + if (bio->bi_status && !orig_bio->bi_status)
> + orig_bio->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> +
> + if (md_io_clone->start_time)
> + bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, md_io_clone->start_time);
> +
> + bio_put(bio);
> + percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_free_cloned_bio);
> +
> /* md_allow_write(mddev)
> * Calling this ensures that the array is marked 'active' so that writes
> * may proceed without blocking. It is important to call this before
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index 8e81f9e2fb20..08db2954006e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ extern void md_finish_reshape(struct mddev *mddev);
> void md_submit_discard_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev,
> struct bio *bio, sector_t start, sector_t size);
> void md_account_bio(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio **bio);
> +void md_free_cloned_bio(struct bio *bio);
>
> extern bool __must_check md_flush_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio
> *bio);
> extern void md_super_write(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev,
> @@ -791,7 +792,7 @@ extern void md_stop_writes(struct mddev *mddev);
> extern int md_rdev_init(struct md_rdev *rdev);
> extern void md_rdev_clear(struct md_rdev *rdev);
>
> -extern void md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio);
> +extern bool md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio);
> extern int mddev_suspend(struct mddev *mddev, bool interruptible);
> extern void mddev_resume(struct mddev *mddev);
> extern void md_idle_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 812d7ec64da5..9a6a1d9eed3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ enum stripe_result {
> STRIPE_RETRY,
> STRIPE_SCHEDULE_AND_RETRY,
> STRIPE_FAIL,
> + STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE,
> };
>
> struct stripe_request_ctx {
> @@ -6036,9 +6037,9 @@ static enum stripe_result make_stripe_request(struct
> mddev *mddev,
> out:
> if (ret == STRIPE_SCHEDULE_AND_RETRY && !mddev->gendisk &&
> reshape_disabled(mddev)) {
> - bi->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> - ret = STRIPE_FAIL;
> - pr_err("dm-raid456: io failed across reshape position while
> reshape can't make progress");
> + bi->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + ret = STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE;
> + pr_err_ratelimited("dm-raid456: io across reshape position
> while reshape can't make progress");
> }
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -6161,7 +6162,7 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev,
> struct bio * bi)
> while (1) {
> res = make_stripe_request(mddev, conf, &ctx, logical_sector,
> bi);
> - if (res == STRIPE_FAIL)
> + if (res == STRIPE_FAIL ||res == STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE)
> break;
>
> if (res == STRIPE_RETRY)
> @@ -6199,8 +6200,13 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev,
> struct bio * bi)
>
> if (rw == WRITE)
> md_write_end(mddev);
> - bio_endio(bi);
> - return true;
> + if (res == STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE) {
> + md_free_cloned_bio(bi);
> + return false;
> + } else {
> + bio_endio(bi);
> + return true;
> + }
> }
>
> > +
> > /* Return sync state string for @state */
> > enum sync_state { st_frozen, st_reshape, st_resync, st_check, st_repair, st_recover, st_idle };
> > static const char *sync_str(enum sync_state state)
> > @@ -4100,6 +4108,7 @@ static struct target_type raid_target = {
> > .ctr = raid_ctr,
> > .dtr = raid_dtr,
> > .map = raid_map,
> > + .end_io = raid_end_io,
> > .status = raid_status,
> > .message = raid_message,
> > .iterate_devices = raid_iterate_devices,
> > =========================================================
> > >
> > >
> > > > md: export helpers to stop sync_thread
> > > > md: export helper md_is_rdwr()
> > > > dm-raid: really frozen sync_thread during suspend
> > > > md/dm-raid: don't call md_reap_sync_thread() directly
> > > > dm-raid: add a new helper prepare_suspend() in md_personality
> > > > md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with
> > > > reshape
> > > > dm-raid: fix lockdep waring in "pers->hot_add_disk"
> > > > dm-raid: remove mddev_suspend/resume()
> > > >
> > > > drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > > drivers/md/md.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > drivers/md/md.h | 16 ++++++
> > > > drivers/md/raid10.c | 16 +-----
> > > > drivers/md/raid5.c | 61 +++++++++++----------
> > > > 5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.2
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > .
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists