[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240228-mbly-gpio-v2-26-3ba757474006@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:28:24 +0100
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 26/30] Documentation: gpio: mention
generic_handle_irq_safe()
generic_handle_irq() must be called from a no-IRQ context. Documentation
advices on using a fake raw lock to call generic_handle_irq() from any
context.
Since 509853f9e1e7 ("genirq: Provide generic_handle_irq_safe()"), a
better alternative is available.
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
---
Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index bf6319cc531b..550d167a82ed 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -339,15 +339,8 @@ Cascaded GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of three categories:
The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled,
so the IRQ core will complain if it is called from an IRQ handler which is
- forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to work around this
- problem::
-
- raw_spinlock_t wa_lock;
- static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
- unsigned long wa_lock_flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
- generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit));
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
+ forced to a thread. generic_handle_irq_safe() can be used to work around
+ this problem; it can safely be called from any context.
- GENERIC CHAINED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are the same as "CHAINED GPIO irqchips",
but chained IRQ handlers are not used. Instead GPIO IRQs dispatching is
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists