[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d44026e7-5ffa-4906-9b59-10fa207ecd51@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:52:11 +0100
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sibyte: pointless if tests
On 24/2/24 23:28, Joe Perches wrote:
> A checkpatch modification was suggested privately about
> braces around an if test like
>
> if (foo)
> ;
>
> so I thought I'd see how many of these possibly pointless
> if tests exist. There aren't many.
>
> Here are a couple in sibyte:
>
> Maybe this should be documented as:
>
> "well, don't know what to do here"
Or pr_devel() / pr_warn() if you want someone to notice it :)
>
> $ cat if_semi.cocci
> @@
> expression e;
> @@
>
> * if (e) ;
>
> $ spatch --very-quiet -sp-file if_semi.cocci .
> diff -u -p ./arch/mips/sibyte/common/cfe_console.c /tmp/nothing/arch/mips/sibyte/common/cfe_console.c
> --- ./arch/mips/sibyte/common/cfe_console.c
> +++ /tmp/nothing/arch/mips/sibyte/common/cfe_console.c
> @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ static void cfe_console_write(struct con
> if (str[i] == '\n') {
> do {
> written = cfe_write(cfe_cons_handle, &str[last], i-last);
> - if (written < 0)
> - ;
> last += written;
> } while (last < i);
> while (cfe_write(cfe_cons_handle, "\r", 1) <= 0)
> @@ -33,8 +31,6 @@ static void cfe_console_write(struct con
> if (last != count) {
> do {
> written = cfe_write(cfe_cons_handle, &str[last], count-last);
> - if (written < 0)
> - ;
> last += written;
> } while (last < count);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists