[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240228-embark-rimmed-d81bab3d42b8@spud>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:58:01 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: antoniu.miclaus@...log.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
Zeynep Arslanbenzer <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add max313xx RTCs
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 02:03:10PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> interrupts:
> + description:
> + Alarm1 interrupt line of the RTC. Some of the RTCs have two interrupt
> + lines and alarm1 interrupt muxing depends on the clockin/clockout
> + configuration.
> maxItems: 1
The maxItems: 1 looks odd here when you state "some of the RTCs have two
interrupt lines", which makes it sound as if there are actually two
interrupts that should be exposed here. If those two interrupts get
muxed to the same pin for output I'd suggest that you clarify that here.
Otherwise, this looks good to me - although I do wonder if the
authorship on the commit (attributed to the analog guys) is still
accurate.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists