linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f95f6787-ed54-4b4d-afbc-30ed25bbf31f@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:26:56 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the rcu tree

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:17:05AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28 2024 at 12:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > The following commit is also in the tip tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> >   020eee167cca ("x86/nmi: Fix "in NMI handler" check")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> >   d54e56f31a34 ("x86/nmi: Fix the inverse "in NMI handler" check")
> >
> > in the tip tree.
> 
> And why the heck is the RCU tree carrying x86 specific stuff which has
> absolutely nothing to do with RCU?
> 
> Just because, right?

So I could test it.

In the future, I will keep such commits out of the portion of -rcu that
is sent to -next.  Apologies for slipping up this time.

							Thanx, Paul