linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Try to fix the sg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpJra0+XKG3CvnTk99gvXg5qgeuSQ3UddU4rx1-S-dNLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:03:49 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Try to fix the sg_mitet bugs in SH MMCIF

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 22:23, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> This adresses some bugs found after the introduction of the
> memory iterator sg_miter to the sh mmcif driver.
>
> This was first just one patch for fixing the atomic bug, but
> now also a second patch is needed to fix a semantic issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Collect Geerts test tag on patch 1
> - Add a second patch fixing the problem with advancing to
>   the next sglist entry before reading/writing the first block and
>   after reading/writing each block in a multiblock operation.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240220-fix-sh-mmcif-v1-1-b9d08a787c1f@linaro.org
>
> ---
> Linus Walleij (2):
>       mmc: sh_mmcif: sg_miter does not need to be atomic
>       mmc: sh_mmcif: Advance sg_miter before reading blocks
>
>  drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> ---

Applied for next and by amending the commit message header as pointed
out by Geert, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe