[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8657f9-e6c8-49b2-9597-21b2192491d3@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:28:51 -0600
From: Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Simplify net_dbg_ratelimited() dummy
On 2/28/24 8:05 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There is no need to wrap calls to the no_printk() helper inside an
> always-false check, as no_printk() already does that internally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
This looks fine. The only difference I see is that no_printk()
returns a value (always 0), while the old way does not. You
could cast the result to void to avoid that.
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/net.h | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
> index c9b4a63791a45948..15df6d5f27a7badc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/net.h
> +++ b/include/linux/net.h
> @@ -299,10 +299,7 @@ do { \
> net_ratelimited_function(pr_debug, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #else
> #define net_dbg_ratelimited(fmt, ...) \
> - do { \
> - if (0) \
> - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> - } while (0)
> + no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #endif
>
> #define net_get_random_once(buf, nbytes) \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists