linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 6/6] virtiofs: use GFP_NOFS when enqueuing request through kworker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:41:26 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	houtao1@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] virtiofs: use GFP_NOFS when enqueuing request through kworker

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>

When invoking virtio_fs_enqueue_req() through kworker, both the
allocation of the sg array and the bounce buffer still use GFP_ATOMIC.
Considering the size of the sg array may be greater than PAGE_SIZE, use
GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_ATOMIC to lower the possibility of memory
allocation failure and to avoid unnecessarily depleting the atomic
reserves. GFP_NOFS is not passed to virtio_fs_enqueue_req() directly,
use GFP_KERNEL and memalloc_nofs_{save|restore} helpers instead.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
---
 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 34b9370beba6d..9ee71051c89f2 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ struct virtio_fs_argbuf {
 };
 
 static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
-				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight);
+				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight,
+				 gfp_t gfp);
 
 static const struct constant_table dax_param_enums[] = {
 	{"always",	FUSE_DAX_ALWAYS },
@@ -394,6 +395,8 @@ static void virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	/* Dispatch pending requests */
 	while (1) {
+		unsigned int flags;
+
 		spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
 		req = list_first_entry_or_null(&fsvq->queued_reqs,
 					       struct fuse_req, list);
@@ -404,7 +407,9 @@ static void virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		list_del_init(&req->list);
 		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
 
-		ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, true);
+		flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
+		ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, true, GFP_KERNEL);
+		memalloc_nofs_restore(flags);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
 				spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
@@ -1332,7 +1337,8 @@ static bool use_scattered_argbuf(struct fuse_req *req)
 
 /* Add a request to a virtqueue and kick the device */
 static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
-				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight)
+				 struct fuse_req *req, bool in_flight,
+				 gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	/* requests need at least 4 elements */
 	struct scatterlist *stack_sgs[6];
@@ -1364,8 +1370,8 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
 	total_sgs = sg_count_fuse_req(req, in_args_len, out_args_len,
 				      flat_argbuf);
 	if (total_sgs > ARRAY_SIZE(stack_sgs)) {
-		sgs = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sgs[0]), GFP_ATOMIC);
-		sg = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sg[0]), GFP_ATOMIC);
+		sgs = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sgs[0]), gfp);
+		sg = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sg[0]), gfp);
 		if (!sgs || !sg) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
@@ -1373,8 +1379,8 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
 	}
 
 	/* Use a bounce buffer since stack args cannot be mapped */
-	req->argbuf = virtio_fs_argbuf_new(in_args_len, out_args_len,
-					   GFP_ATOMIC, flat_argbuf);
+	req->argbuf = virtio_fs_argbuf_new(in_args_len, out_args_len, gfp,
+					   flat_argbuf);
 	if (!req->argbuf) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -1473,7 +1479,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
 		 fuse_len_args(req->args->out_numargs, req->args->out_args));
 
 	fsvq = &fs->vqs[queue_id];
-	ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, false);
+	ret = virtio_fs_enqueue_req(fsvq, req, false, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
 			/*
-- 
2.29.2