linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ad7944 ADCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44fcf7d0-9399-42d9-81b0-e744bc37a831@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:29:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ad7944 ADCs

On 29/02/2024 15:35, David Lechner wrote:
>>>
>>> v2 changes:
>>> - Removed default 'multi' value from adi,spi-mode property. This simplifies
>>>   things a bit by not having to check for two possible conditions (absence of
>>>   property or explicit default value). Now, only absence of property is valid to
>>>   indicate the default mode. Constraints that depend on this property are
>>>   updated accordingly.
>>> - Fixed spelling of 'conventional'.
>>> - Expanded description to call out potential confusion of '3-wire' mode being
>>>   unrelated to the standard spi-3wire property.
>>> - Added standard '#daisy-chained-devices' property for chain mode.
>>> - Relaxed requirement of cnv-gpios since it was determined that an active high
>>>   CS could actually be used in chain mode.
>>
>> ? Please don't edit patches manually... Use git or git+b4. Or quilt?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Oh geez, yeah really dumb mistake. Will resend. I do use b4 but it
> doesn't handle per-patch changelogs that I know of.

Per-patch changelog is the job for git.

Best regards,
Krzysztof