[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BFEA2A31-3147-49EF-A9BE-592C90E783DD@toblux.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:40:22 +0100
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
Cc: linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: Use div64_ul() instead of do_div()
> On Feb 29, 2024, at 20:41, Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 29, 2024, at 19:45, Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> All of the fixes in this patch seem to be correct, but this doesn't
>> cover nilfs_resize_fs(), nilfs_max_segment_count(), and
>> nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(), which also have do_div() that doesn't use the
>> return value.
>
> For nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(), where the dividend is u64 and the divisor is u32, we
> would need a dedicated function like div64_u32() that doesn't calculate the
> remainder, which doesn't seem to exist. What do you think?
Never mind, there is div_u64(u64, u32). I'll submit a v2 shortly.
Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists