[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240229205240.GA361626@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:52:40 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: PCIe fixes and
GICv3 ITS enable
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:10:21PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 05:54:16PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > > As I mentioned, the 'required-opps' binding update is needed to
> > > fix the missing OPP vote so blocking the binding patch would
> > > block merging the DT fix which could otherwise go into 6.8.
>
> > I agree that the fix gets the priority. But some maintainers
> > perfer to merge fix patches _only_ if they are fixing the issue
> > introduced in the ongoing release. But if Bjorn has no issues in
> > merging these for 6.8, then it is fine.
I do prefer to merge only regression and important fixes after the
merge window, so I want to be able to provide justification.
> It also depends on the severity of the issue and to some extent the
> complexity of the fix. These binding fixes are certainly low risk.
> :)
IIUC we're talking about:
arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add missing PCIe minimum OPP
dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'required-opps'
These don't look like a regression fix (correct me if I'm wrong), and
I can't tell whether they fix a user-visible problem, since
sc8280xp.dtsi does already contain 'required-opps' for ufs_mem_hc,
usb_0, and usb_1, which are mentioned in the commit log as covering up
the issue.
If these patches wait until v6.9, what badness ensues?
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists