[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec4481a-25d5-41db-9d6a-c9e8b9bce310@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:10:00 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, broonie@...nel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Define an ISS code for watchpoint
exception
On 2/28/24 20:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 03:16:15PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
>> index 353fe08546cf..6c0a0b77fd2c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@
>> #define ESR_ELx_CM_SHIFT (8)
>> #define ESR_ELx_CM (UL(1) << ESR_ELx_CM_SHIFT)
>>
>> +/* ISS field definitions for Watchpoint exception */
>> +#define ESR_ELx_WnR_SHIFT (6)
>> +#define ESR_ELx_WnR (UL(1) << ESR_ELx_WnR_SHIFT)
>
> We had ESR_ELx_WNR since about 2015, maybe even earlier in the form of
> EL1 or EL2. Only that the 'n' is uppercase. So please use that, don't
> add a new definition.
Right, reusing existing ESR_ELx_WNR makes sense, will respin the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists