linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: PCIe fixes and GICv3 ITS enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZeA3Dbyd9SPfwdPU@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:49:33 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: PCIe fixes and
 GICv3 ITS enable

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:30:03AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 2/28/24 23:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:

> >> Johan Hovold (12):
> >>    dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'required-opps'
> >>    dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Do not require 'msi-map-mask'
> >>    dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'aspm-no-l0s'
> >>    PCI: qcom: Add support for disabling ASPM L0s in devicetree

> > What about the 'required-opps' and 'msi-map-mask' patches?  If they're
> > important, I can merge them for v6.8, too, but it's late in the cycle
> > and it's not clear from the commit logs why they shouldn't wait for
> > v6.9.
> 
> Either way, I believe they should go through the qcom tree, as it's
> a very hot one with lots of different changes to a given file.

I think Bjorn was just referring to the three binding patches listed
above and which should go through the PCI tree (unlike the later DT
fixes which will go through the Qualcomm SoC tree).

Johan