[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZeA62vK1QB0xfjmX@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:05:46 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Vamshi Gajjela <vamshigajjela@...gle.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: Fix kernel panic on rmmod
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:35:23AM +0530, Vamshi Gajjela wrote:
> Ensure consistency in spmi_controller pointers between
> spmi_controller_remove/put and driver spmi_del_controller functions.
> The former requires a pointer to struct spmi_controller, while the
> latter passes a pointer of struct spmi_controller_dev, leading to a
> "Null pointer exception".
>
> Signed-off-by: Vamshi Gajjela <vamshigajjela@...gle.com>
> Fixes: 70f59c90c819 ("staging: spmi: add Hikey 970 SPMI controller driver")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> v2:
> - Split into two separate patches
> - add Fixes and Cc stable
You need to mark this patch more clearly as a stable backport (e.g.
using a "[PATCH-stable]" prefix), and explain that the corresponding
issue has already been fixed upstream by commits:
490d88ef548d ("spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: Use devm_spmi_controller_add()")
ffdfbafdc4f4 ("spmi: Use devm_spmi_controller_alloc()")
but that those commits (and their dependencies) are too intrusive to
backport.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists