linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: gamma: Change MT8195 to single enum group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a717b209-ec31-4a43-a93c-47d65a464c80@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:47:38 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@...iatek.com>,
 Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@...iatek.com>,
 Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>, Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
 Shawn Sung <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>,
 Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
 Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: gamma: Change MT8195
 to single enum group

Il 29/02/24 03:35, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> Since MT8195 gamma has multiple bank for 12 bits LUT and it is
> different from any other SoC LUT setting.
> 
> So we move MT8195 compatible from the one of items to the
> single enum group.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml    | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
> index c6641acd75d6..3e6cb8f48bcc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>         - enum:
>             - mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma
>             - mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma
> +          - mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma
>         - items:
>             - enum:
>                 - mediatek,mt6795-disp-gamma
> @@ -33,7 +34,6 @@ properties:
>                 - mediatek,mt8186-disp-gamma
>                 - mediatek,mt8188-disp-gamma
>                 - mediatek,mt8192-disp-gamma
> -              - mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma

While I agree on allowing mt8195-disp-gamma to have its own separated compatible
as the IP is actually different from the one in MT8183, you can't do it like that,
or dtbs_check will fail validation for the mt8195 devicetree.

That one declares...

gamma0: gamma@...06000 {
	compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma", "mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma";

..Please always run dtbs_check when performing bindings modifications.

Cheers,
Angelo

>             - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma
>   
>     reg: