[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240229101101.5208195c@xps-13>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:11:01 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>, Linux MTD List
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux ARM List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Broadcom Kernel List
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, f.fainelli@...il.com,
kursad.oney@...adcom.com, joel.peshkin@...adcom.com,
anand.gore@...adcom.com, dregan@...l.com, kamal.dasu@...adcom.com,
tomer.yacoby@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com, Andre Przywara
<andre.przywara@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Kamal Dasu
<kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>, David Regan <dregan@...adcom.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Brian Norris
<computersforpeace@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: driver and doc updates
Hi Florian,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com wrote on Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:36:02 -0800:
> On 2/22/24 19:47, William Zhang wrote:
> > This patch series is an update from the previous version [1] after
> > exex_op support and fixes (patch 1 to 4 from the previous version.)
> >
> > It updates all the BCMBCA SoC to support the nand controller and add
> > functions to handle BCMBCA specific needs on ECC and Write Protection
> > usage. The device tree document is also updated accordingly with the new
> > properties needed by the driver.
> >
> > In addition there is a bug fix for exec_op helper functions, log level
> > adjustment on uncorrectable ECC error and some coding style fixes.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230606231252.94838-1-william.zhang@broadcom.com/
>
> Miquel, thanks for having applied the patches, we should have discussed ahead of time whether you should take the SoC/board-level DTS changes through your tree or mine, but it's fine either way and should not lead to conflicts in Linus' tree.
I'm sorry for not thinking about this ahead of time, I was also not
Cced on the other patches, I noticed it (told Willliam) and just forgot
about this when I applied the series.
It is currently living in -next so if there is any problem I can still
act.
However for this kind of change I usually apply the bindings and .c
changes independently from the DT patches. I believe there is no
problem having one or the other being merged first, or do I overlook
something?
Cheers,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists