Message-ID: <202d7b66-edc4-4416-a32f-4d702742f44b@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:15:01 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/dmabuf-heap: conform test to TAP format
 output

On 2/28/24 11:47 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:46 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/27/24 10:18 PM, T.J. Mercier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:21 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
>>> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
>>>> functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> - Update some more error handling code
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c      | 217 +++++++-----------
>>>>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
>>>> index 890a8236a8ba7..41a8485cad5d0 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>>>  #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/dma-heap.h>
>>>>  #include <drm/drm.h>
>>>> +#include "../kselftest.h"
>>>>
>>>>  #define DEVPATH "/dev/dma_heap"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -90,14 +91,13 @@ static int dmabuf_heap_open(char *name)
>>>>         char buf[256];
>>>>
>>>>         ret = snprintf(buf, 256, "%s/%s", DEVPATH, name);
>>>> -       if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -               printf("snprintf failed!\n");
>>>> -               return ret;
>>>> -       }
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               ksft_exit_fail_msg("snprintf failed!\n");
>>>>
>>>>         fd = open(buf, O_RDWR);
>>>>         if (fd < 0)
>>>> -               printf("open %s failed!\n", buf);
>>>> +               ksft_exit_fail_msg("open %s failed: %s\n", buf, strerror(errno));
>>>> +
>>>>         return fd;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int dmabuf_sync(int fd, int start_stop)
>>>>
>>>>  #define ONE_MEG (1024 * 1024)
>>>>
>>>> -static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
>>>> +static void test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
>>>>  {
>>>>         int heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd = -1, importer_fd = -1;
>>>>         uint32_t handle = 0;
>>>> @@ -148,16 +148,12 @@ static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
>>>>         int ret;
>>>>
>>>>         heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name);
>>>> -       if (heap_fd < 0)
>>>> -               return -1;
>>>>
>>>> -       printf("  Testing allocation and importing:  ");
>>>> +       ksft_print_msg("Testing allocation and importing:\n");
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(heap_fd, ONE_MEG, 0, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (ret) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (Allocation Failed!)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> +       if (ret)
>>>> +               ksft_exit_fail_msg("FAIL (Allocation Failed!)\n");
>>>> +
>>>>         /* mmap and write a simple pattern */
>>>>         p = mmap(NULL,
>>>>                  ONE_MEG,
>>>> @@ -165,11 +161,8 @@ static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
>>>>                  MAP_SHARED,
>>>>                  dmabuf_fd,
>>>>                  0);
>>>> -       if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (mmap() failed)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> +       if (p == MAP_FAILED)
>>>> +               ksft_exit_fail_msg("FAIL (mmap() failed)\n");
>>>>
>>>>         dmabuf_sync(dmabuf_fd, DMA_BUF_SYNC_START);
>>>>         memset(p, 1, ONE_MEG / 2);
>>>> @@ -179,31 +172,28 @@ static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
>>>>         importer_fd = open_vgem();
>>>>         if (importer_fd < 0) {
>>>>                 ret = importer_fd;
>>>> -               printf("(Could not open vgem - skipping):  ");
>>>> +               ksft_test_result_skip("Could not open vgem\n");
>>>>         } else {
>>>>                 ret = import_vgem_fd(importer_fd, dmabuf_fd, &handle);
>>>> -               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -                       printf("FAIL (Failed to import buffer)\n");
>>>> -                       goto out;
>>>> -               }
>>>> +               ksft_test_result(ret >= 0, "Import buffer\n");
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_sync(dmabuf_fd, DMA_BUF_SYNC_START);
>>>>         if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (DMA_BUF_SYNC_START failed!)\n");
>>>> +               ksft_print_msg("FAIL (DMA_BUF_SYNC_START failed!)\n");
>>>>                 goto out;
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>>         memset(p, 0xff, ONE_MEG);
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_sync(dmabuf_fd, DMA_BUF_SYNC_END);
>>>>         if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (DMA_BUF_SYNC_END failed!)\n");
>>>> +               ksft_print_msg("FAIL (DMA_BUF_SYNC_END failed!)\n");
>>>>                 goto out;
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>>         close_handle(importer_fd, handle);
>>>> -       ret = 0;
>>>> -       printf(" OK\n");
>>>> +       ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
>>>> +       return;
>>>>  out:
>>>>         if (p)
>>>>                 munmap(p, ONE_MEG);
>>>> @@ -214,35 +204,30 @@ static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
>>>>         if (heap_fd >= 0)
>>>>                 close(heap_fd);
>>>>
>>>> -       return ret;
>>>> +       ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", __func__);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -static int test_alloc_zeroed(char *heap_name, size_t size)
>>>> +static void test_alloc_zeroed(char *heap_name, size_t size)
>>>>  {
>>>>         int heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd[32];
>>>>         int i, j, ret;
>>>>         void *p = NULL;
>>>>         char *c;
>>>>
>>>> -       printf("  Testing alloced %ldk buffers are zeroed:  ", size / 1024);
>>>> +       ksft_print_msg("Testing alloced %ldk buffers are zeroed:\n", size / 1024);
>>>>         heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name);
>>>> -       if (heap_fd < 0)
>>>> -               return -1;
>>>>
>>>>         /* Allocate and fill a bunch of buffers */
>>>>         for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
>>>>                 ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(heap_fd, size, 0, &dmabuf_fd[i]);
>>>> -               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -                       printf("FAIL (Allocation (%i) failed)\n", i);
>>>> -                       goto out;
>>>> -               }
>>>> +               if (ret)
>>>> +                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("FAIL (Allocation (%i) failed)\n", i);
>>>> +
>>>>                 /* mmap and fill with simple pattern */
>>>>                 p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, dmabuf_fd[i], 0);
>>>> -               if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
>>>> -                       printf("FAIL (mmap() failed!)\n");
>>>> -                       ret = -1;
>>>> -                       goto out;
>>>> -               }
>>>> +               if (p == MAP_FAILED)
>>>> +                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("FAIL (mmap() failed!)\n");
>>>
>>> So based on the previous ksft_exit_fail_msg calls I thought your
>>> intention was to exit the program and never run subsequent tests when
>>> errors occurred. That's what led to my initial comment about switching
>>> to ksft_exit_fail_msg from ksft_print_msg here, and I expected to see
>>> only ksft_exit_fail_msg for error cases afterwards. But you're still
>>> mixing ksft_exit_fail_msg and (ksft_print_msg +
>>> ksft_test_result{_pass,_fail,_skip}) so we've got a mix of behaviors
>>> where some errors lead to complete program exits and different errors
>>> lead to skipped/failed tests followed by further progress.
>>>
>>> It seems most useful and predictable to me to have all tests run even
>>> after encountering an error for a single test, which we don't get when
>>> ksft_exit_fail_msg is called from the individual tests. I was fine
>>> with switching all error handling to ksft_exit_fail_msg to eliminate
>>> cleanup code and reduce maintenance, but I think we should be
>>> consistent with the behavior for dealing with errors which this
>>> doesn't currently have. So let's either always call ksft_exit_fail_msg
>>> for errors, or never call it (my preference).
>> The following rules are being used:
>> - If a fetal error occurs where initial conditions to perform a test aren't
>> fulfilled, we exit the entire test by ksft_exit_fail_msg().
> 
> But this doesn't exit just the test, it exits the entire program.
> 
>> - If some test fails after fulfilling of initial conditions,
>> ksft_print_msg() + ksft_test_result{_pass,_fail} are used to avoid putting
>> multiple ksft_test_result_fail() and later ksft_test_result_pass.
>>
>> ksft_exit_fail_msg() like behaviour was being followed before this patch.
>> On non-zero return value, all of following test weren't being run.
>> ksft_exit_fail_msg() cannot be used on every failure as it wouldn't run
>> following test cases.
> 
> Yeah this is what I'm saying. I'd prefer to always run remaining test
> cases for the current heap, and all test cases for subsequent heaps
> following an error so you can see all the passes/fails at once. (like
> continue in the while loop in main instead of break w/the current
> implementation) ksft_exit_fail_msg ends the whole program and that's
> what was happening before, but that means the number of test results
> that gets reported is inconsistent (unless everything always passes
> for all heaps). Failures from one heap mask passes/fails in failures
> from other heaps, and that's inconvenient for CI which expects to see
> the same set of reported test results across runs, but will have
> nothing to report for tests skipped due to premature program exit from
> ksft_exit_fail_msg that could have been a single test failure. Like
> you mentioned this would be a behavior change, but IDK if it's worth
> the churn to exactly duplicate the existing behavior and then go back
> to retouch many of the same spots in a later patch to get (what I
> consider) better behavior from the program.
> 
> The docs mention about calling ksft_exit_* only once after all tests
> are finished:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h?h=v6.8-rc6#n29
> 
> But actual usage seems to be split between ksft_exit_fail_msg for all
> the things (e.g. fchmodat2_test.c), and ksft_exit_skip/fail for
> prerequisites + ksft_test_result_skip/pass/fail for individual tests
> followed by ksft_exit_fail_msg once at the end (e.g.
> ksm_functional_tests.c).
> 
> So what you have is fine based on the fact that nobody has fixed it
> yet, but I think we could do better for not a lot of work here.
I'll send a v3 by fixing only the other thing you caught.

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>
>>> Slight tangent:
>>> For this specific MAP_FAILED error, I don't actually think it should
>>> be considered a test failure because the mmap operation is optional
>>> for dma-buf: https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/dma-buf.html#c.dma_buf_ops.
>>> It would be pretty unusual to get a buffer like that, and skipping
>>> instead of failing when that happens would differ from the original
>>> behavior of the test so that could go in another patch, but I wanted
>>> to point this out.
>> I see. This can be done in another patch after this one.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>>                 dmabuf_sync(dmabuf_fd[i], DMA_BUF_SYNC_START);
>>>>                 memset(p, 0xff, size);
>>>>                 dmabuf_sync(dmabuf_fd[i], DMA_BUF_SYNC_END);
>>>> @@ -255,23 +240,19 @@ static int test_alloc_zeroed(char *heap_name, size_t size)
>>>>         /* Allocate and validate all buffers are zeroed */
>>>>         for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
>>>>                 ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(heap_fd, size, 0, &dmabuf_fd[i]);
>>>> -               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -                       printf("FAIL (Allocation (%i) failed)\n", i);
>>>> -                       goto out;
>>>> -               }
>>>> +               if (ret < 0)
>>>> +                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("FAIL (Allocation (%i) failed)\n", i);
>>>>
>>>>                 /* mmap and validate everything is zero */
>>>>                 p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, dmabuf_fd[i], 0);
>>>> -               if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
>>>> -                       printf("FAIL (mmap() failed!)\n");
>>>> -                       ret = -1;
>>>> -                       goto out;
>>>> -               }
>>>> +               if (p == MAP_FAILED)
>>>> +                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("FAIL (mmap() failed!)\n");
>>>> +
>>>>                 dmabuf_sync(dmabuf_fd[i], DMA_BUF_SYNC_START);
>>>>                 c = (char *)p;
>>>>                 for (j = 0; j < size; j++) {
>>>>                         if (c[j] != 0) {
>>>> -                               printf("FAIL (Allocated buffer not zeroed @ %i)\n", j);
>>>> +                               ksft_print_msg("FAIL (Allocated buffer not zeroed @ %i)\n", j);
>>>>                                 break;
>>>>                         }
>>>>                 }
>>>> @@ -283,16 +264,8 @@ static int test_alloc_zeroed(char *heap_name, size_t size)
>>>>                 close(dmabuf_fd[i]);
>>>>
>>>>         close(heap_fd);
>>>> -       printf("OK\n");
>>>> -       return 0;
>>>> -
>>>> -out:
>>>> -       while (i > 0) {
>>>> -               close(dmabuf_fd[i]);
>>>> -               i--;
>>>> -       }
>>>> -       close(heap_fd);
>>>> -       return ret;
>>>> +       ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
>>>
>>> Don't we need ksft_test_result based on whether we ever see a non-zero
>>> value so that we get ksft_cnt.ksft_fail++ for the failure case?
>>> Otherwise we could have all non-zero values and the test would still
>>> pass with a bunch of "FAIL (Allocated buffer not zeroed"
>>> ksft_print_msg.
>> Yeah, I'll fix it.
>>
>>>
>>>> +       return;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  /* Test the ioctl version compatibility w/ a smaller structure then expected */
>>>> @@ -360,126 +333,98 @@ static int dmabuf_heap_alloc_newer(int fd, size_t len, unsigned int flags,
>>>>         return ret;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -static int test_alloc_compat(char *heap_name)
>>>> +static void test_alloc_compat(char *heap_name)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       int heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd = -1;
>>>> -       int ret;
>>>> +       int ret, heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd = -1;
>>>>
>>>>         heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name);
>>>> -       if (heap_fd < 0)
>>>> -               return -1;
>>>>
>>>> -       printf("  Testing (theoretical)older alloc compat:  ");
>>>> +       ksft_print_msg("Testing (theoretical) older alloc compat:\n");
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc_older(heap_fd, ONE_MEG, 0, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (ret) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (Older compat allocation failed!)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> -       close(dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       printf("OK\n");
>>>> +       if (dmabuf_fd >= 0)
>>>> +               close(dmabuf_fd);
>>>> +       ksft_test_result(!ret, "dmabuf_heap_alloc_older\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       printf("  Testing (theoretical)newer alloc compat:  ");
>>>> +       ksft_print_msg("Testing (theoretical) newer alloc compat:\n");
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc_newer(heap_fd, ONE_MEG, 0, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (ret) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (Newer compat allocation failed!)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> -       printf("OK\n");
>>>> -out:
>>>>         if (dmabuf_fd >= 0)
>>>>                 close(dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (heap_fd >= 0)
>>>> -               close(heap_fd);
>>>> +       ksft_test_result(!ret, "dmabuf_heap_alloc_newer\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       return ret;
>>>> +       close(heap_fd);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -static int test_alloc_errors(char *heap_name)
>>>> +static void test_alloc_errors(char *heap_name)
>>>>  {
>>>>         int heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd = -1;
>>>>         int ret;
>>>>
>>>>         heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name);
>>>> -       if (heap_fd < 0)
>>>> -               return -1;
>>>>
>>>> -       printf("  Testing expected error cases:  ");
>>>> +       ksft_print_msg("Testing expected error cases:\n");
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(0, ONE_MEG, 0x111111, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (!ret) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (Did not see expected error (invalid fd)!)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> +       ksft_test_result(ret, "Error expected on invalid fd\n");
>>>>
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(heap_fd, ONE_MEG, 0x111111, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (!ret) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (Did not see expected error (invalid heap flags)!)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> +       ksft_test_result(ret, "Error expected on invalid heap flags\n");
>>>>
>>>>         ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc_fdflags(heap_fd, ONE_MEG,
>>>>                                         ~(O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC), 0, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> -       if (!ret) {
>>>> -               printf("FAIL (Did not see expected error (invalid fd flags)!)\n");
>>>> -               ret = -1;
>>>> -               goto out;
>>>> -       }
>>>> +       ksft_test_result(ret, "Error expected on invalid heap flags\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       printf("OK\n");
>>>> -       ret = 0;
>>>> -out:
>>>>         if (dmabuf_fd >= 0)
>>>>                 close(dmabuf_fd);
>>>>         if (heap_fd >= 0)
>>>>                 close(heap_fd);
>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> -       return ret;
>>>> +static int numer_of_heaps(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       DIR *d = opendir(DEVPATH);
>>>> +       struct dirent *dir;
>>>> +       int heaps = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +       while ((dir = readdir(d))) {
>>>> +               if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, ".", 2))
>>>> +                       continue;
>>>> +               if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, "..", 3))
>>>> +                       continue;
>>>> +               heaps++;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       return heaps;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  int main(void)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       DIR *d;
>>>>         struct dirent *dir;
>>>> -       int ret = -1;
>>>> +       DIR *d;
>>>> +
>>>> +       ksft_print_header();
>>>>
>>>>         d = opendir(DEVPATH);
>>>>         if (!d) {
>>>> -               printf("No %s directory?\n", DEVPATH);
>>>> -               return -1;
>>>> +               ksft_print_msg("No %s directory?\n", DEVPATH);
>>>> +               return KSFT_SKIP;
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>> -       while ((dir = readdir(d)) != NULL) {
>>>> +       ksft_set_plan(9 * numer_of_heaps());
>>>> +
>>>> +       while ((dir = readdir(d))) {
>>>>                 if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, ".", 2))
>>>>                         continue;
>>>>                 if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, "..", 3))
>>>>                         continue;
>>>>
>>>> -               printf("Testing heap: %s\n", dir->d_name);
>>>> -               printf("=======================================\n");
>>>> -               ret = test_alloc_and_import(dir->d_name);
>>>> -               if (ret)
>>>> -                       break;
>>>> -
>>>> -               ret = test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, 4 * 1024);
>>>> -               if (ret)
>>>> -                       break;
>>>> -
>>>> -               ret = test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, ONE_MEG);
>>>> -               if (ret)
>>>> -                       break;
>>>> -
>>>> -               ret = test_alloc_compat(dir->d_name);
>>>> -               if (ret)
>>>> -                       break;
>>>> -
>>>> -               ret = test_alloc_errors(dir->d_name);
>>>> -               if (ret)
>>>> -                       break;
>>>> +               ksft_print_msg("Testing heap: %s\n", dir->d_name);
>>>> +               ksft_print_msg("=======================================\n");
>>>> +               test_alloc_and_import(dir->d_name);
>>>> +               test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, 4 * 1024);
>>>> +               test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, ONE_MEG);
>>>> +               test_alloc_compat(dir->d_name);
>>>> +               test_alloc_errors(dir->d_name);
>>>>         }
>>>>         closedir(d);
>>>>
>>>> -       return ret;
>>>> +       ksft_finished();
>>>>  }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.42.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> BR,
>> Muhammad Usama Anjum
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists