[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b81aa6f-db51-4a7c-97ab-2af2c2fea056@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:09:56 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: jaegeuk@...nel.org, Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix blkofs_end correctly in
f2fs_migrate_blocks()
Jaegeuk, Daeho,
Any comments on this serials?
Thanks,
On 2024/2/26 9:32, Chao Yu wrote:
> In f2fs_migrate_blocks(), when traversing blocks in last section,
> blkofs_end should be (start_blk + blkcnt - 1) % blk_per_sec, fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index c21b92f18463..0c728e82d936 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -3841,13 +3841,14 @@ static int f2fs_migrate_blocks(struct inode *inode, block_t start_blk,
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> unsigned int blkofs;
> unsigned int blk_per_sec = BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
> + unsigned int end_blk = start_blk + blkcnt - 1;
> unsigned int secidx = start_blk / blk_per_sec;
> unsigned int end_sec;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (!blkcnt)
> return 0;
> - end_sec = secidx + (blkcnt - 1) / blk_per_sec;
> + end_sec = end_blk / blk_per_sec;
>
> f2fs_down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping);
> @@ -3857,7 +3858,7 @@ static int f2fs_migrate_blocks(struct inode *inode, block_t start_blk,
>
> for (; secidx <= end_sec; secidx++) {
> unsigned int blkofs_end = secidx == end_sec ?
> - (blkcnt - 1) % blk_per_sec : blk_per_sec - 1;
> + end_blk % blk_per_sec : blk_per_sec - 1;
>
> f2fs_down_write(&sbi->pin_sem);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists