linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3fb89aa-56b4-4b3c-88f6-c6320bf5c489@gtucker.io>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:53:38 +0100
From: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@...il.com>,
 Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>, linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org,
 dave.pigott@...labora.com, mripard@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 gustavo.padovan@...labora.com, pawiecz@...labora.com,
 tales.aparecida@...il.com, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 kernelci@...ts.linux.dev, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
 kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, nfraprado@...labora.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
 cocci@...ia.fr, Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, laura.nao@...labora.com,
 ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, kernel@...labora.com,
 torvalds@...uxfoundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel
 Testing

On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> 
>>> Of course. You're also welcome to join the #kernelci channel on libera.chat.
> 
>> Isn't that a bit pointless if it's no the main IM channel ?
> 
> It *was* the original channel and still gets some usage (mostly started
> by me admittedly since I've never joined slack for a bunch of reasons
> that make it hassle), IIRC the Slack was started because there were some
> interns who had trouble figuring out IRC and intermittent connectivity
> but people seem to have migrated.

In fact it was initially created for the members of the Linux
Foundation project only, which is why registration is moderated
for emails that don't have a domain linked to a member (BTW not
any Google account will just work e.g. @gmail.com is moderated,
only @google.com for Google employees isn't).

And yes IRC is the "least common denominator" chat platform.
Maybe having a bridge between the main Slack channel and IRC
would help.

Guillaume