linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240229122503.GH30889@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:25:03 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@...il.com>,
	Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>, linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org,
	dave.pigott@...labora.com, mripard@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, gustavo.padovan@...labora.com,
	pawiecz@...labora.com, tales.aparecida@...il.com,
	workflows@...r.kernel.org, kernelci@...ts.linux.dev,
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	nfraprado@...labora.com, davidgow@...gle.com, cocci@...ia.fr,
	Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, laura.nao@...labora.com,
	ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, kernel@...labora.com,
	torvalds@...uxfoundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for
 Kernel Testing

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > > 
> > >>> Of course. You're also welcome to join the #kernelci channel on libera.chat.
> > > 
> > >> Isn't that a bit pointless if it's no the main IM channel ?
> > > 
> > > It *was* the original channel and still gets some usage (mostly started
> > > by me admittedly since I've never joined slack for a bunch of reasons
> > > that make it hassle), IIRC the Slack was started because there were some
> > > interns who had trouble figuring out IRC and intermittent connectivity
> > > but people seem to have migrated.
> > 
> > In fact it was initially created for the members of the Linux
> > Foundation project only, which is why registration is moderated
> > for emails that don't have a domain linked to a member (BTW not
> > any Google account will just work e.g. @gmail.com is moderated,
> > only @google.com for Google employees isn't).
> > 
> > And yes IRC is the "least common denominator" chat platform.
> > Maybe having a bridge between the main Slack channel and IRC
> > would help.
> 
> If the gitlab CI pipeline proposal wants to be considered for inclusion
> in the kernel, I think it needs to switch to a free software solution
> for its *main* communication channels.

And to clarify, I didn't meant the kernel CI project, but only the
gitlab CI pipeline for the Linux kernel project. I don't know how
tightly integrated the two projects are though.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart