linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] driver core & device property: clean up APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 19:57:42 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] driver core & device property: clean up APIs

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 07:46:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:23:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There are two, but dependent pair of patches that:
> > - makes some of devlink APIs static
> > - removes 'proxy' header use
> > 
> > This is rebased on top of latest patches from Jonathan as it has a minor
> > conflict in property.h. The series can be applied directly to driver
> > core tree with reduced context, but it may be better just to route it
> > via IIO. Greg, which way do you prefer?
> 
> Why would IIO mess with driver core stuff?
> 
> I can just take it in my driver core tree, thanks.

Let me base on your driver-core-testing then.
Thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko