linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 06/15] mptcp: check userspace pm flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 19:18:30 +0100
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>, 
 Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
 "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/15] mptcp: check userspace pm flags

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>

Just like MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SIGNAL flag is checked in userspace PM
announce mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(), PM flags should be checked in
mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit() too.

If MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW flag is not set, there's no flags field
in the output of dump_addr. This looks a bit strange:

        id 10 flags  10.0.3.2

This patch uses mptcp_pm_parse_entry() instead of mptcp_pm_parse_addr()
to get the PM flags of the entry and check it. MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SIGNAL
flag shouldn't be set here, and if MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW flag is
missing from the netlink attribute, always set this flag.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
index d6b7be3afbe5..3bd13e94b568 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
@@ -334,7 +334,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	struct nlattr *laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry local = { 0 };
 	struct mptcp_addr_info addr_r;
-	struct mptcp_addr_info addr_l;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	struct sock *sk;
@@ -360,25 +359,31 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		goto create_err;
 	}

-	err = mptcp_pm_parse_addr(laddr, info, &addr_l);
+	err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(laddr, info, true, &local);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, laddr, "error parsing local addr");
 		goto create_err;
 	}

+	if (local.flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SIGNAL) {
+		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "invalid addr flags");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto create_err;
+	}
+	local.flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW;
+
 	err = mptcp_pm_parse_addr(raddr, info, &addr_r);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, raddr, "error parsing remote addr");
 		goto create_err;
 	}

-	if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, &addr_l, &addr_r)) {
+	if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, &local.addr, &addr_r)) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "families mismatch");
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto create_err;
 	}

-	local.addr = addr_l;
 	err = mptcp_userspace_pm_append_new_local_addr(msk, &local, false);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "did not match address and id");
@@ -387,7 +392,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)

 	lock_sock(sk);

-	err = __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &addr_l, &addr_r);
+	err = __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local.addr, &addr_r);

 	release_sock(sk);

-- 
2.43.0