linux-kernel - Re: [SPAM] [PATCH v1] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Parse Error correctly in i2c GSI mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <zpkc4hxxkalw2cqhp5fbhdge4vhfrthi2ezhkpecninqvdcn6n@oddo2j6tabce>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 19:20:22 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
Cc: konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org, 
	wsa@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [PATCH v1] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Parse Error correctly in
 i2c GSI mode

Hi Mukesh,

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:56:38PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> we are seeing protocol errors like NACK as transfer failure but

/we/We/

> ideally it should report exact error like NACK, BUS_PROTO or ARB_LOST.
> 
> Hence we are adding such error support in GSI mode and reporting it
> accordingly by adding respective error logs.
> 
> geni_i2c_gpi_xfer() needed to allocate heap based memory instead of

Please use the imperative form.

> stack memory to handle and store the geni_i2c_dev handle.
> 
> Copy event status from GSI driver to the i2c device status and parse
> error when callback comes from gsi driver to the i2c driver. In the
> gpi.c, we need to store callback param into i2c config data structure
> so that inside the i2c driver, we can check what exactly the error is
> and parse it accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: d8703554f4de ("i2c: qcom-geni: Add support for GPI DMA")

What bug are you fixing here? The description doesn't talk about
fixes rather than support added.

..

> -	config.peripheral_config = &peripheral;
> -	config.peripheral_size = sizeof(peripheral);
> +	peripheral = devm_kzalloc(gi2c->se.dev, sizeof(*peripheral), GFP_KERNEL);

This is a massive leak. Why are you deciding to make the
allocation dynamic?

Thanks,
Andi