[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170932136988.3731358.12075871779065575043.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:30:21 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf lock contention: Account contending locks too
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:33:35 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently it accounts the contention using delta between timestamps in
> lock:contention_begin and lock:contention_end tracepoints. But it means
> the lock should see the both events during the monitoring period.
>
> Actually there are 4 cases that happen with the monitoring:
>
> monitoring period
> / \
> | |
> 1: B------+-----------------------+--------E
> 2: B----+-------------E |
> 3: | B-----------+----E
> 4: | B-------------E |
> | |
> t0 t1
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
--
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists