lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:07:16 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, 
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, vaclav.zindulka@...pnet.cz, 
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>, 
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/net_sched: Fix tracepoints that save qdisc_dev()
 as a string

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 2:59 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:24:17 -0500
> Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
> > > Fixes: a34dac0b90552 ("net_sched: add tracepoints for qdisc_reset() and qdisc_destroy()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > Should this be targeting the net tree?
>
> I was going to say that I need this for my work, but my work is aimed at
> the next merge window, but this should go into the kernel now and be marked
> for stable. So yes, it probably should go through the net tree.
>
> Do I need to resubmit it?
>

My view is it needs to be merged.
I note there are some big changes in net and net-next trees right now
that move the name - probably from 43a71cd66b9c0
Coco Li and Eric are on your Cc already.

> > Otherwise, LGTM. Just wondering - this worked before because "name"
> > was the first field?
>
> Looks like it. See commit 43a71cd66b9c0 ("net-device: reorganize net_device
> fast path variables")
>
> I wonder if there's anything else that uses a pointer to struct net_device
> thinking it can just be switched to find the name?
>

>From a quick scan i cant find anything obvious.

cheers,
jamal

> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ