[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65e254047fbce_2bce9294cf@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:17:40 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Ingo
Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Pawan
Gupta" <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "Dan
Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: x86 boot issues in -next
[ add Greg ]
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/1/24 13:29, Mark Brown wrote:
> > For the past few days -next has been failing to boot an x86_64 defconfig
> > on the x86 machine Linaro has available in their lab. DMI says it's a
> > "Dell Inc. PowerEdge R200/0TY019, BIOS 1.4.3 05/15/2009" and the CPU is
> > described as "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz (family: 0x6, model:
> > 0xf, stepping: 0xb)", it's running happily with mainline and
> > pending-fixes.
>
> This wouldn't explain the bisect results, but there's been a crash fixed
> in here:
>
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/170863445442.1479840.1818801787239831650.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/
>
> that looks pretty similar to your signature.
>
> Could you give Dan's patch a shot?
>
Hey Greg, this indeed looks like something that will be fixed when you
update driver-core-next.
http://lore.kernel.org/r/2024022342-unbroken-september-e58d@gregkh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists