[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44f00418-b09b-5ee5-c70c-d4580ffd0049@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:47:59 -0800
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: Add DWC31 version 2.00a controller
Hi Greg,
On 3/1/2024 1:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:35:54PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote:
>> Add revision value for identifying DWC31 version 2.00a based controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>> index df544ec730d2..f3bbbc1947bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>> @@ -1259,6 +1259,7 @@ struct dwc3 {
>> #define DWC31_REVISION_170A 0x3137302a
>> #define DWC31_REVISION_180A 0x3138302a
>> #define DWC31_REVISION_190A 0x3139302a
>> +#define DWC31_REVISION_200A 0x3230302a
>
> What code uses this define?
>
Don't think there is anything within the DWC3 core that would be
different specifically for 2.00a versus previous revisions. (so far)
> Why add a define that is not used?
>
There is a running list of all the DWC3 revisions. Not all of them are
being used, so my understanding was that we're just keeping track of all
possible version values that can be read from the DWC3 version HW
register. If this is the not the case, maybe we can just leave this out
until we find a need to add it.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists