linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Fix the error path order in gpiochip_add_data_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:41:09 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Fix the error path order in gpiochip_add_data_with_key()

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:21 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:26:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 5:29 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I'm sorry I really need more (morning) coffee, maybe you can simply update
> > > > > yourself or submit a correct fix?
> > > >
> > > > Ok, I'll apply this and send a fix on top of it.
> > >
> > > I don't see any progress with this. Do I need to do something?
> >
> > No, it just fell through the cracks. I applied this now and sent my
> > own fix on top.
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>

Hey!

I now realized that this commit doesn't really fix ba5c5effe02c
("gpio: initialize descriptor SRCU structure before adding OF-based
chips"). It addresses an issue introduced as long ago as commit
2f4133bb5f14 ("gpiolib: No need to call gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges()
twice").

I will change the Fixes tag, queue it for fixes and send it to
Torvalds for rc7, then merge them back into for-next.

Bart