| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:57:35 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, TJ Adams <tadamsjr@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes
for SATA devices
On 01/03/2024 01:37, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> Libata sysfs attributes cannot be used for libsas managed SATA devices
> because the ata_port location is different for libsas.
>
> Defined sysfs attributes (visible for SATA devices only):
> - /sys/block/*/device/sas_ncq_prio_enable
> - /sys/block/*/device/sas_ncq_prio_supported
it would be good to show the full path
>
> The newly defined attributes will pass the correct ata_port to libata
> helper functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: TJ Adams <tadamsjr@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/scsi/sas_ata.h | 6 +++
> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> index 12e2653846e3..e0b19eee09b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> @@ -964,3 +964,90 @@ int sas_execute_ata_cmd(struct domain_device *device, u8 *fis, int force_phy_id)
> force_phy_id, &tmf_task);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_execute_ata_cmd);
> +
> +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_supported_show(struct device *device,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> + int res;
> +
> + // This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only
Please don't use c99 comment style
> + if (WARN_ON(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + res = ata_ncq_prio_supported(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev);
> + if (res < 0)
> + return res;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", res);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sas_ncq_prio_supported);
> +
> +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_show(struct device *device,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> + int res;
> +
> + // This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only
> + if (WARN_ON(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + res = ata_ncq_prio_enabled(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev);
> + if (res < 0)
> + return res;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", res);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_store(struct device *device,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> + long input;
> + int res;
> +
> + // This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only
> + if (WARN_ON(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + res = kstrtol(buf, 10, &input);
I think that kstrtobool_from_user() could be used. But
kstrtobool_from_user() handles more than 0/1, so that would be a
different behaviour, so maybe better not to use.
I would also suggest factor out some of ata_ncq_prio_enable_store() with
this, but a public API which accepts char * would be a bit odd.
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> + if ((input < 0) || (input > 1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return ata_ncq_prio_enable(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, input) ? : len;
Please don't use ternary operator like this. This seems more
straightforfward:
res = ata_ncq_prio_enable();
if (res)
return res;
return len;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(sas_ncq_prio_enable);
> +
> +static struct attribute *sas_ata_sdev_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_sas_ncq_prio_supported.attr,
> + &dev_attr_sas_ncq_prio_enable.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static umode_t sas_ata_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct attribute *attr, int i)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> +
> + if (!dev_is_sata(ddev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return attr->mode;
> +}
> +
> +const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = sas_ata_sdev_attrs,
> + .is_visible = sas_ata_attr_is_visible,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_ata_sdev_attr_group);
> diff --git a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> index 2f8c719840a6..cded782fdf33 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ int smp_ata_check_ready_type(struct ata_link *link);
> int sas_discover_sata(struct domain_device *dev);
> int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *phy,
> struct domain_device *child, int phy_id);
> +
> +extern const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group;
> #else
>
> static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
> @@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
> sas_ata_disabled_notice();
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = NULL,
> +};
> #endif
>
> #endif /* _SAS_ATA_H_ */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists