linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] Check whether the wakeup task is eligible first

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240301130100.267727-1-kumaran.4353@gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2024 13:01:00 +0000
From: Balakumaran Kannan <kumaran.4353@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org,
	Balakumaran Kannan <kumaran.4353@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Check whether the wakeup task is eligible first

check_prempt_wakeup_fair is checking whether the current task has to be
preempted by the newly wake-up task. To avoid multiple swaps the logic
is decided as if the wake-up task is the best task then only preempt the
current task.

In CFS time, getting the best task was as simple as piking the left-most
node. But in EEVDF non-fast path, the entire tree has to be traversed in
a worst case scenario.

So, IMHO let's first check the newly wake-up task is eligible before
searching for the best task.

Signed-off-by: Balakumaran Kannan <kumaran.4353@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  - Fixed the commit message with proper name and Signed-off-by

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 533547e3c90a..8d810d6a2cb7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8334,7 +8334,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
 	/*
 	 * XXX pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) != se ?
 	 */
-	if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse)
+	if (entity_eligible(cfs_rq, pse) && (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse))
 		goto preempt;

 	return;
-- 
2.33.8