[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240301-spalten-impfschutz-4118b8fcf5b3@brauner>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:36:55 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix mount parameters check for empty values
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:30:09PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Now that parameters that have the flag 'fs_param_can_be_empty' set and
> their value is NULL are handled as 'flag' type, we need to properly check
> for empty (NULL) values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 0f931d0c227d..44ba2212dfb3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -2183,12 +2183,12 @@ static int ext4_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
> switch (token) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
> case Opt_usrjquota:
> - if (!*param->string)
> + if (!param->string)
> return unnote_qf_name(fc, USRQUOTA);
I fail to understand how that can happen. Currently both of these
options are parsed as strings via:
#define fsparam_string_empty(NAME, OPT) \
__fsparam(fs_param_is_string, NAME, OPT, fs_param_can_be_empty, NULL)
So if someone sets fsconfig(..., FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "usrquota", NULL, ...)
we give an immediate
case FSCONFIG_SET_STRING:
if (!_key || !_value || aux) return -EINVAL;
from fsconfig() so we know that param->string cannot be NULL. If that
were the case we'd NULL deref in fs_param_is_string():
int fs_param_is_string(struct p_log *log, const struct fs_parameter_spec *p,
struct fs_parameter *param, struct fs_parse_result *result)
{
if (param->type != fs_value_is_string ||
(!*param->string && !(p->flags & fs_param_can_be_empty)))
So you're check above seems wrong. If I'm mistaken, please explain, how
this can happen in detail.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists